Gates of wrath
Dec. 27th, 2016 08:41 amLiving in Seattle, it's pretty much cool and fashionable to dislike anything and everything.
Bill Gates is the occasional exception - people WANT to dislike him, but what he does in the community and the sheer amount of money he shells out to charity keeps him in a favorable public eye. Yet, he's the topic of a lot of debate. There's a strong argument to be made he made his money off stealing and modifying already existing/developing ideas, and that he used his financial and political clout to stiff other companies from growing or competing, even if they had better products. He's effectively even admitted this, to his credit. The fuzzy part is the debate if he's "made amends" for his wrongdoing by sharing his earnings with those in need and less fortunate.
Jobs is already gone, and once Gates is finished, it'll be a good case study to see how the two are viewed historically. Likely a net positive for both, only growing as time goes on. Typically the net positives only gain favorability the further you get from their lives.
Bill Gates is the occasional exception - people WANT to dislike him, but what he does in the community and the sheer amount of money he shells out to charity keeps him in a favorable public eye. Yet, he's the topic of a lot of debate. There's a strong argument to be made he made his money off stealing and modifying already existing/developing ideas, and that he used his financial and political clout to stiff other companies from growing or competing, even if they had better products. He's effectively even admitted this, to his credit. The fuzzy part is the debate if he's "made amends" for his wrongdoing by sharing his earnings with those in need and less fortunate.
Jobs is already gone, and once Gates is finished, it'll be a good case study to see how the two are viewed historically. Likely a net positive for both, only growing as time goes on. Typically the net positives only gain favorability the further you get from their lives.